The questionnaire
Someone with leverage is asking for evidence of AI supervision, and the honest answer today is a paragraph of adjectives.
Watchbill™ puts every AI agent on a named watch, under a named human, on an append‑only record. When someone asks you to prove the supervision holds, hand them the watchbill.
Two moments bring people here. Neither one is about how well the agents work.
Someone with leverage is asking for evidence of AI supervision, and the honest answer today is a paragraph of adjectives.
An agent did something nobody authorized, it got caught late, and the postmortem found there was no record of who was supposed to be watching.
Agents are standing watch on your production systems tonight. Watchbill is how you know who put them there, who is over them, and how you prove it when someone asks.
Every agent stands a named watch, with a defined station, under a named human who holds the authority to stop it.
Agents propose. Humans commit.
Every assignment, proposal, commit, and refusal lands on an append‑only record you can hand to an auditor, an insurer, or a customer without preparing a word.
The watch bill puts a person’s name against every station.
Show the watchbill.
Not a paragraph about how seriously you take AI safety. A roster: every agent on a named watch, under a named human, with the record of who held authority, what was proposed, what a person committed, and what was refused.
A passed check is a claim, not a clearance. The record shows what a human committed in a given window, and it shows what the gate refused. It does not promise that nothing can ever go wrong, because the product exists to keep people from making exactly that kind of promise.