Skip to content
WATCHBILL from Blue Jacket
Supervised Autonomy · on the record

Your agents are driving the business. Who has the watch?

Watchbill™ puts every AI agent on a named watch, under a named human, on an append‑only record. When someone asks you to prove the supervision holds, hand them the watchbill.

Request a briefing

The moment

It arrives as a question you cannot answer with adjectives

Two moments bring people here. Neither one is about how well the agents work.

01

The questionnaire

Someone with leverage is asking for evidence of AI supervision, and the honest answer today is a paragraph of adjectives.

02

The near miss

An agent did something nobody authorized, it got caught late, and the postmortem found there was no record of who was supposed to be watching.


Agents are standing watch on your production systems tonight. Watchbill is how you know who put them there, who is over them, and how you prove it when someone asks.
The standing orders

Three promises, and every artifact traces to one

01

No unmanned watch

Every agent stands a named watch, with a defined station, under a named human who holds the authority to stop it.

02

Nothing irreversible without the human on watch

Agents propose. Humans commit.

03

The record survives the watch

Every assignment, proposal, commit, and refusal lands on an append‑only record you can hand to an auditor, an insurer, or a customer without preparing a word.

The watch model

Delegation made explicit, bounded, and revocable

The watch bill puts a person’s name against every station.

The watch model The watchbill assigns an agent to a station. The agent proposes an act. The gate holds the act until the watch officer, a named human, commits it or refuses it. Both the commit and the refusal land on the append-only record. THE WATCH MODEL WATCH OFFICER a named human, holding the authority THE WATCHBILL the roster THE WATCH one agent, on station THE GATE nothing irreversible THE RECORD append‑only ASSIGNS PROPOSES COMMITS OR REFUSES Authority is delegated. Accountability is not. The commit and the refusal both land on the record.
Roles and authorities, at principle level
The answer to the asker

Show the watchbill.

Not a paragraph about how seriously you take AI safety. A roster: every agent on a named watch, under a named human, with the record of who held authority, what was proposed, what a person committed, and what was refused.

What a reviewer receives

Measured, not attested

We say what the system does not do

A passed check is a claim, not a clearance. The record shows what a human committed in a given window, and it shows what the gate refused. It does not promise that nothing can ever go wrong, because the product exists to keep people from making exactly that kind of promise.

Request a briefing